RCR & Scholarly Activity In-Person Training

Introduction

Going to start by answering some key questions:

  • Why is this necessary?
  • Who made this decision?
  • Who needs the training and when?

Why is UK mandating RCR training?

“As a public institution of higher education, public confidence in the responsible conduct of research (RCR) by faculty, staff and students is critical. We must promote and maintain a culture that is supported by an infrastructure that educates and assists in the ethical conduct of research.”

Lisa Cassis PhD, former UK Vice President for Research (VPR)

UK has had research misconduct cases in the past few years due to a failure of some researchers to follow Responsible Conduct of Research.

This effects:

  • The reputation of UK and its researchers;
  • Researchers/research personnel affiliated with the wrongdoer;
  • Personnel managing the process for research misconduct;
  • Researchers doing honest work that could have received the research funding used;
  • General public if faulty data is used in publications is relied upon by the medical community, product development, etc.

Examples

*Then College of Medicine Dean Robert DiPaola was a co-author on one paper

Who made this decision?

“In an effort to ensure a baseline level of responsible conduct of research awareness and hopefully prevent research misconduct, a mandate of responsible conduct of research training was initiated based on a decision by a committee of representatives from several UK offices including offices under the VPR, the legal office, and the Dean for the College of Medicine at the time (current Provost).

Who needs the training and when?

All researchers and research-eligible UK personnel and graduate students are required to adhere to the RCR online course mandate in addition to the in-person training/discussion and it must be completed biennially.

Included in the mandate:

  • Full-time faculty
  • Staff
  • Graduate students (only have to complete the training once)
  • Trainees (undergraduates, postdoctoral fellows, visiting scientists)
  • Individuals supported in part or fully through research funding, grants and contracts.

What does the training include?

  1. Online Training
    • Individuals complete modules and associated quizzes through the CITI platform.
    • Must be completed every 2 years by research-eligible individuals. *Graduate students complete the components once unless joining a research project, grant, or sponsored project.
  2. In-person training / discussion
    • One, one-hour session attended on Zoom or in-person on campus.
    • Must be completed every 2 years.

Areas of RCR Training at UK

  • Mentoring
  • Conflict of Interest
  • Peer Review
  • Research Misconduct
  • Data Management
  • Safe Work Environments
  • Reproducibility of Research Results

What Will The Rest of the Day Look Like?

  • Observe 3 case studies
  • Discuss in groups
  • Summarize key points

Must have minimum 1 hour of contact together

Case Study One

Plagiarism

In this session, learners will learn about self-plagiarism.

Through this case, learners will:

  1. Learn about self-plagiarism
  2. Learn how to properly reference prior work regardless of author
  3. Learn about university resources related to this case study

Case Study #1

Discussion

  1. Sum up the general problem presented in the scenario.
  2. What is self-plagiarism? In this case, do you consider what Dr. Sunny has done to be self-plagiarism? Why or why not?
  3. Is it appropriate to use paragraphs or sentences and list the reference but not quotation marks to note a citation?
  4. Is it appropriate to include direct quotes from a source that has been referenced but lacks the use of quotation marks?

Additional Resources

Case Study Two

Research Misconduct: Generative AI

In this session, learners will consider issues related to research misconduct and the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning in research and creative endeavors.

Through this case, learners will:

  1. Consider ethical approaches to research and creative work.
  2. Learn about resources related to the presented scenario.

Case Study #2

Discussion

  1. Sum up the general problem presented in the scenario.
  2. Is William correct in their assumption that they will not be held liable for the text used from the generative TextAI software?
  3. Does UK have any guidance on using generative AI/machine learning in research endeavors?
  4. What advice would you give to the student about using generative AI/machine learning in their research endeavors?
  5. Are there any concerns researchers should take into account for entering data into a generative AI software?

Additional Resources

Case Study Three

Mentoring / Safe Work Environment

In this session, learners will learn about mentoring, safe work environment issues and methods for reporting misconduct at the University.

Through this case, learners will:

  1. Learn about appropriate behavior with regards to mentoring
  2. Consider how to respond to safe work environment issues
  3. Learn how to report misconduct at the University

Case Study #3

Discussion

  1. What issues can you identify in this case?
  2. What are the responsibilities for both the mentor and mentee in developing a respectful and productive working relationship?
  3. What could Nicole do if her PI is unwilling to meet? Is there anyone else she can contact to try and resolve the situation?
  4. How can Dr. Sha create a more inclusive working environment?
  5. What are ways you can help promote a safe working environment?

Additional Resources

Feedback

Reflect

  • Let’s identify three main takeaways from the training.
  • What lingering questions do you still have regarding the content?
  • How might you improve this training specifically for CI graduate students in the future?

Case Studies

Post-session RCR Case Study Survey - https://uky.az1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_79CaFBt2jglwtMi

Thank you!!